On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 6:25 AM vinnie venus <7thmaskedmarvel@gmail.com> wrote:
P.s.
I’m not saying these 200 kilometre pedal rides are easy.
If anyone thinks that they are?
Especially in the heat of yesterdays ride to port Rowan?
Their crazy.
But , that doesn’t alter the truth of what I just said.
Either.
You give me no weight to carry?
Like the pros do?
And
You give me a really good bicycle?
Like the pros have?
And a credit card with lots of money?
So I can call for help if my bike breaks down on the highway?
Then I’m doing a 300 to 400 kilometre bike ride.
In one day.
That’s obvious.
And I highly doubt most pro cyclists If any for that matter could say that.
Pure and simple.
Summary?
Started at 6:33 am.
Got to port Rowan at 2:35 pm.
Stayed a bit.
Also had brief half hour stays in port burwell and port Bruce.
In both directions.
Actually.
Then got back to London at 10:10 pm.
Not bad.
So?
The last 3 bicycle rides I’ve done all
amount to ‘’’at least 231 kilometres or more.
If I’m counting correctly?
In 3 rids I’ve pedaled over 720 kilometres.
In three straight rides.
While carrying a lot of weight.
On only an
Pros use credit cards.
And have a great bikes.
And don’t carry weight.
And pros usually only do about 200 kilometres a day.
Imagine I had a really good bike?
Like the pros do?
And pros never carry weight.
Like I do.
That slows a bike down.
If I could just do one ride?
Without carrying weight?
On a credit card?
Like the sissy pros do?
I’m pretty sure I’d get to 300 kilometres.
Pedalling
In only one day.
Maybe even 400?
If I’m feeling strong?
And the wind is light.
Without many hills.
On a ride.
If only I could try that?
I’m really curious.
Because I’m always carrying so much weight.
Even on this above average bike.
I’d like to try it.
I’m betting, if I carry no weight?
I’d get to 300 kilometres.
In one day.
Just got home.
Made it to port Rowan. The phone won’t let me send anymore pictures. Stupid phone.
a letter sent to Lyn.
Entering Norfolk county?!!!
Woe nooo! I’ve heard that crazies are near here. I wonder if it’s true?
Are you scared for me, Lyn?
A field of watermelons . I think? A huge field. Maybe thousands of watermelons?
With yellow flowers. In each plant growing a watermelon .
And
Every single yellow flower has at least two hornets or bees in side.
Right before port burwell. On Nova Scotia road.
I checked at least 30 of em.
This doesn’t scare you, Carissa?a
Carissa. Does it?
Summarizing.
I summarize the facts in that link . Oo wait! I forgot to say this.
I went to bed at about 1:11 am and woke up at 4:03 am.
According to my clock.
I did yesterdays bike ride on 3 hours sleep the night before.
So that means, I pedaled a bicycle 231.1 kilometres on almost no sleep.
The night before.
I was tired.
But I kept going.
Just to see if I could do it.
Ya know?
I think that’s funny.
TO THE READERS OF THIS WEBSITE.
THIS IS AN APPEAL TO ANYBODY SENSIBLE READING THIS WEBSITE.
AND 'ON THAT NOTE, THE COMMENT SECTIONS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE QUITE NOTABLE.
JUST FOR THE APPROPRIATE SAKE OF RECORD.
WOULD SOMEBODY 'PLEASE' LOOK AT THE FACTS ADDRESSED IN THIS WEBSITE?
AND THEN HELP ME TAKE THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA TO COURT?
FOR COMMITTING ATROCITIES AGAINST ME.
THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT HAS HAPPENED HERE.
PLEASE READ THE FACTS LOCATED IN THIS WEBSITE. TO SEE WHAT I REFER TO THERE. AND A BRIEF NOTE. I INCLUDE IMAGES WHICH APPLY TO THIS SITE.
PLEASE IGNORE THE IMAGES , WHEN FIRST READING THIS SITE. THE READER WILL UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM SAYING BETTER IF THEY DO THAT FIRST.
LOOK AT THE IMAGES AFTER. THANK YOU.
ALSO I WISH TO SAY THIS. BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE.
ADDRESSED BELOW .
AND WORDED AS FOLLOWS.
THOUGHT.- IF THE TRUTH BE KNOWN,
CANADAS PRESENT LAWS ARE TECHNICALLY CRAZY. THIS WEBSITES
OBVIOUS FACTS PROVE THAT
STATEMENT TO BE ACCURATE.
AND PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT TOTALLY
RATIONAL FOLLOW LAWS THAT
ARE CRAZY.
THATS OBVIOUS.
AND ON THAT NOTE I'LL SAY THIS.
YOU KNOW WHAT.? ON A PERSONAL NOTE
I'D ASSUME, ONLY SOMEONE WITH A TIME MACHINE COULD HAVE INSTITUTED
SUCH CRAZY LAWS IN CANADA PRESENTLY.
TO THE READER. READ THIS WEBSITE TO SEE WHAT I MEAN BY THAT STATEMENT.
I'M NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE FUNCTIONS OF TIME TRAVEL. IN THIS WEBSITE.
BUT MY POINT IS, 'TECHNICALLY SPEAKIUNG, DELIBERATELY EVILCRAZY PEOPLE INSTITUTE LAWS THAT ARE CORRUPT.
THATS WHY I SAY THAT. I'M SUSPICIOUS. SOMETHING DOESN'T ADD UP HERE.
IN CANADA.
.
BECAUSE CANADAS PRESENT LAWS IN MANY WAYS ARE NOT
INSTITUTED RIGHTEOUSLY. READ THIS WEBSITE FOR A BEGINNERS
LESSON ON THAT STATEMENT.
EINSTEIN NEVER SAID TIME TRAVEL WAS IMPOSSIBLE. EINSTEIN SAID
YOU HAVE TO SUPERCEDE THE SPEED OF LIGHT TO MASTER TIME TRAVEL.
MANY FACETS OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY TODAY CAN DO THAT.
THATS OBVIOUS. WHEN A PERSON LOOKS AT THE FACTS OF EVERYTHING
IN THIS LIFE PRESENTLY.
MANY FACETS OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY TODAY CAN DO THAT.
THATS OBVIOUS. WHEN A PERSON LOOKS AT THE FACTS OF EVERYTHING
IN THIS LIFE PRESENTLY.
PERFECTLY CLEAR AND PERFECTLY SIMPLE.
AND ON THAT NOTE I BEGIN THE FACTUAL ADDRESSED CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE.
MUSIC OPTION-CLICK HERE
AND ON THAT NOTE I BEGIN THE FACTUAL ADDRESSED CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE.
AND ON THAT NOTE I BEGIN THE FACTUAL ADDRESSED CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. REGARDING THE MATTER OF MY DRIVERS LICENCE SUSPENSION, SOMETIMES I FEEL, I COULD CRY OVER THIS.
BUT WHATEVER. ANYWAYS. YES. WHATEVER. SO
I CARRY ON. SO I CARRY ON.
SO NOW, ANYHOW. NOW,
IN
SUMMARIZING MY DRIVERS LICENCE SITUATION.
ONCE AGAIN I MUST NOW SAY THIS.
AW YES.
THE FOLLOWING MUST BE ADDRESSED IN WRITING. NOT THAT I HAVEN;'T
ADDRESSED THESE MATTERS BEFORE. BUT ANYWAYS HERE I GO IN ADDRESSING THE
FACTS OF THIS SITUATION AGAIN. WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ADDRESSED.
FIRST, I GOT MY DRIVERS LICENCE- G LICENCE IN 1999 A D.
OR 2000.
ONE OF THOSE TWO YEARS.
ANYWAYS, TO SUMMARIZE THIS SITUATION, I
BORROWED A LOT OF MONEY, TO GET MY DRIVERS LICENCE. MONEY I COULD NOT
PAY BACK BECAUSE THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION ILLEGALLY SUSPENDED MY
DRIVERS LICENCE FOR BICYCLE FINES.
I PROVED THIS TO THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION IN PERSON.
I WENT TO THEIR OFFICE. ON EXETER ROAD. IN LONDON ONTARIO.
AND SPOKE PERSONALLY FACE TO FACE WITH A LADY. AND A MAN.
WORKING THERE.
AND AFTER EXPLAINING MY SITUATION TO THEM, THEY STATED TO ME, IT APPEARED I WAS CORRECT.
THEY HAD SUSPENDED MY DRIVERS LICENCE ILLEGALLY.
BUT THEY COULDN'T CORRECT THE SITUATION.
THEY SAID THAT.
BECAUSE, THEY SAID, THE RECORDED SUSPENSION WAS ALREADY IN THE SYSTEM RECORDS ON THEIR COMPUTERS.
SO, THEY SAID, I HAD TO GO TO A COURT TO CORRECT THEIR MISTAKE.
THEY BROKE THE LAW. BY TAKING AWAY MY DRIVERS LICENCE ILLEGALLY ON THEIR PARTS.
BUT I HAD TO FIX THEIR MISTAKE.
''''HUH?'''' I SAID.
THEY CHOOSE TO WASTE MY TIME, IRRATIONALLY, FOR NO GOOD REASON. SO I LOST WORK .
I ALSO LOST MY EMPLOYMENT. BECAUSE THE
GENTLEMAN WHO PROMISED TO HIRE ME WHEN I GOT MY DRIVERS LICENCE SAID HE
NEEDED TO HIRE SOMEONE. BECAUSE HE HAD TO.
FOR HIS BUISNESS. HE COULDNT WAIT ANOTHER YEAR. HE HAD CLIENTS WHO NEEDED HIM THEN. NOT A YEAR FROM THEN.
OOO? I SAID. REALLY? YOU CANT WAIT
ANOTHER YEAR SIR? AND PUT YOUR BUISNESS ON HOLD FOR ME? BECAUSE
THEMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT ILLEGALLY
SUSPENDED MY DRIVERS LICENCE.
AND THEN DIDN'T CORRECT THEIR OWN MISTAKE? OOO? OKAY.''
I SAID.
SO THE GOVERNMENT AND ITS WORKERS BROKE THEIR OWN LAWS. AND THEY GOT PAID THEIR REGULAR SALARIES. HYPOCRITICALLY DOING SO.
SO, ON THAT NOTE- I THEN REALIZED I
HAD TO GO TO COURT. IN CANADA. AND BEG AND PLEAD FOR THE CANADIAN
GOVERNMENT TO DO THE RIGHT THING. AND GIVE ME MY LICENCE BACK.
SO I COULD WORK, AND BE A USEFUL MEMBER OF SOCIETY. IN CANADA.
'''WHEREIN I WAS TOLD I WOULD HAVE TO GO TO A CANADIAN COURT AND SAY THIS.
TO A CANADIAN JUDGE.
O PLEASE 'CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, PLEASE
DO THE RIGHT THING? AND DONT BREAK YOUR OWN LAWS BY ILLEGALLY
SUSPENDING MY DRIVERS LICENCE>/ PLEASE/ I BEG OF YOU, PLEASE?''''
THATS WHAT I WAS TOLD TO DO.
SO.
SO, ON THAT NOTE, I THEN, WENT THROUGH ALL THE MOTIONS OF THAT SITUATION...
THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION, BY THE WAY, HIRED THEIR OWN LAWYER , TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK.
BY THE WAY.
AFTER THEY TOLD ME AND ADMITTED TO ME I
WAS IN THE RIGHT, THEY ACTUALLY STILL HIRED A LAWYER TO PREVENT ME FROM
GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK. ///
ISNT THAT INCREDIBLE/ ON THEIR PART?
THEY HIRED A LAWYER. TO DO THAT.
A LAWYER WHO ACTUALLY SMELLED LIKE HE WAS ACTUALLY FARTING.
WHEN I STOOD IN THE COURT ROOM WITH HIM THAT DAY.
AND WHO TALKED A LOT TO THE JUDGE BEFORE THE COURT CASE.
WHO IN TURN KIND OF LOOKED LIKE FRANK
CAPRIO. THE CHIEF JUDGE IN PROVIDENCE. WEIRD. BUT ANYWAYS. TO CONTINUE
ON MY FACTUAL INFORMATION I ADDRESS HERE REGARDING MY DRIVERS LICENCE,
THIS LAWYER TALKED A LOT TO THE JUDGE.
THE LAWYER THE MINISTRY OF ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION HIRED. TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK THAT DAY.
WHY/ IT CERTAIN APPEARS THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS OBVIOUS.
BECAUSE THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION
AND THEIR WORKERS WERE TOTALLY INFURIATED THAT I MIGHT FIND WORK AND DO
WHAT IS RIGHT WITH MY LIFE.
WEIRD ON THEIR PARTS. BUT THATS WHAT HAPPENED. SO, WHAT OTHER ANSWER COULD I POSSIBLY DRAW? TO THAT SITUATION.
SO THEY HIRED THEIR OWN LAWYER TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK.
INCREDIBLE BUT TRUE.
SO, THERE I WAS IN THAT COURT ROOM, ACTUALLY WATCHING THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION LAWYER CHIT CHAT WITH THE JUDGE.
BEFORE COURT STARTED.
THEN, FINALLY, MY COURT CASE ARRIVED.
AFTER A FULL YEAR OF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT DELIBERATELY PREVENTING ME FROM WORKING ILLEGALLY ON THEIR PARTS.
I GO TO COURT,
AND WAIT PATIENTLY IN COURT ALL DAY ALMOST FOR MY CASE TO ARRIVE.
FINALLY MY COURT CASE COMES UP, AND I STAND BEFORE A JUDGE TO PRESENT MY CASE.
THE JUDGE THEN ALARMED, SAYS THIS.
'''SIR!
MY GOD!
WHERES YOUR LAWYER!""??
YOUR NOT GOING TO FACE ME WITHOUT A LAWYER, ARE YOU?"""
HE SHRIEKED AT ME.
AT THAT MOMENT IN TIME.
I RESPONDED BACK TO THAT QUESTION WITH THE FOLLOWING WORDS.
''''PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO THIS, SIR. I DO NOT HAVE MONEY TO HIRE A LAWYER, SIR. BUT, I HAVE STUDIED THIS CASE. SIR.
AND I CAN DEFEND MYSELF ON THIS MATTER, IN ORDER TO ATTAIN JUSTICE IN THIS CASE-NO PROBLEM THERE. I KNOW THE FACTS.
SO IF WE CAN PROCEED, I WILL DO JUST THAT. WITH FACTS.''
AS COURTS DESIRE ''''''FACTS.''''
RIGHT? FACTS. DON'T WORRY. I'LL GIVE YOU THE FACTS OF THIS CASE. JUST START COURT. AND I'LL DO SO.
COURTS DESIRE FACTS?'' RIGHT?
EVEN KANGAROO COURTS..'''
I SAID TO THAT JUDGE.
ON THAT NOTE HE RESPONDED IN THIS FASHION. IN A LOUD VOICE HE SAID THIS.
'''NOT IN MY COURT ROOM!!
NO WAY!!
YOU HIRE A LAWYER AND PAY MONEY TO A LAWYER- IN ORDER TO BE DEFENDED IN MY COURT!'''
HE SHOUTED!
OR NO JUSTICE IS COMING YOUR WAY! NOT IN MY COURT'''
HE SHOUTED AT ME.
I LOOKED AT HIS ANTICS AT THIS POINT.
AND I WAS QUITE AMAZED THAT A JUDGE WOULD SAY THAT TO ME. IN A COURT OF LAW.
SO I SAID THIS AT THAT CONJECTURE TO THAT JUDGE.
.
''SIR, YOU JUST SAID TO ME, NO
JUSTICE WOULD BE COMING MY WAY ON THIS SUBJECT OF MY DRIVERS
LICENCE-UNLESS I PAID A LAWYER MONEY TO DEFND ME IN THIS MATTER,
RIGHT?''
'''YES.'' HE RESPONDED TO THAT QUESTION.
SO, I SAID ,
''''ISN'T THAT BRIBERY, SIR?'''
TO THAT QUESTION, THE JUDGE LOOKED OFFENDED AND IRRITATED.
THAT I ASKED SUCH A QUESTION.
AND BASAICALLY ON THAT NOTE HE DEMANDED THAT I SHUT UP AND BE REMOVED FROM HIS COURT ROOM.
I THEN ASKED THE JUDGE THAT DAY ANOTHER QUESTION.
I SAID THIS.
'/'SIR, THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS STATE THE FOLLOWING.
IT IS WRITTEN IN THE CONSTITUTION THAT
A CANADIAN CITIZEN HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND HIMSELF OR HERSELF IN A
CANADIAN COURT OF LAW ON ANY MATTER OF LAW WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF ANY MATTER
RELATED TO LAW IN THIS COUNTRY OF THE SAID INCIDENT BEING INSTITUTED AS
A MATTER APPLIED TO THE COURTS LOCATED ANYWHERE IN THE NATION OF
CANADA.
. THAT IS PART OF THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION, SIR./'''''''''''
I SAID TO HIM.
HE THEN SAID TO ME THE FOLLOWING IN A SOMEWHAT LOUD VOICE..
'' I DON'T CARE THAT THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AND THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION SAYS YOU HAVE THAT RIGHT!'''
HE SAID.
GET OUT OF MY COURT ROOM.!''
HE EXCLAIMED TO ME AT THAT POINT...
BASICALLY HE SAID TO ME, AT THAT POINT TO GO JUMP IN A LAKE, IN OTHER WORDS.
AND I SUSPECT, AT THAT POINT, IF HE COULD HAVE SHOVED ME INTO A LAKE, HE WOULD HAVE.
REFLECTIVE OF THIS IMAGE. BELOW.
''SO YOUR BREAKING YOUR HIPPOCRATIC OATH TO UPHOLD THE LAWS OF CANADA THEN?'''
I SAID TO HIM AT THAT POINT.
OR YOUR BREAKING THE OATH YOU TOOK
WHEN YOU ENTERED INTO THE JUDGES CIRCUIT AND WHEN YOU TOOK YOUR BAR
EXAM, AND THEN ENTERED INTO LAW.
YOU DID TAKE A HIPPOCRATIC OATH, OR SOME KIND OF OATH TO UPHOLD THE LAW AT THAT POINT, CORRECT?'' I SAID TO THIS JUDGE.
''''RIGHT? WHEN YOU BECAME A JUDGE, IN CANADA? RIGHT?"""
I SAID TO HIM.
HE THEN SHRIEKED LOUDLY THE FOLLOWING WORDS TO ME.
I DON'T CARE IF ITS WRITTEN IN THE
CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO
DEFEND YOURSELF IN ANY CANADIAN COURT ON THIS MATTER,
WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THIS SAID
INCIDENT TAKING PLACE! REGARDING YOUR DRIVERS LICENCE BEING OBVIOUSLY
ILLEGALLY SUSPENDED BY CANADAS GLORIOUSLY DIVINE EVIL AUTHORITY FIGURES
IN THIS SUBJECT!!!
GET OUT OF MY COURTROOM!''
HE SHOUTED WILDLY AT THAT POINT IN TIME.
AND IN DOING SO, I MEAN IN SHOUTING
THAT TO ME AT THAT POINT IN TIME, I THINK HE MIGHT HAVE HAD A BIT OF
DROOL EMERGING FROM HIS MOUTH...
JUDGE LITTLE WAS HIS NAME...!''
I SAID AT THAT POINT. COMPOSE YOURSELF, SIR.
AND
AT THAT POINT, IT WAS SOMEWHAT ALARRMING, TO ME, AT LEAST, THAT HE WAS A JUDGE IN CANADA, I THOUGHT. AT THAT POINT.
BUT ANYWAYS, HE REFUSED TO SAY ANYTHING ELSE TO ME. I GUESS HE WAS PLEADING THE FIFTH AMENDMENT OR SOMETHING ON THAT COUNT.
REFLECTIVE OF THIS IMAGE HERE.
.
EXACTLY. YES. EXACTLY.
THEN I WAS ESCORTED OUT OF THAT GLORIOUS CANADIAN COURTROOM BY TWO WONDERFUL BAILIFFS. WHO WERE EYEING ME WILDLY.
KIND OF LIKE THOSE GUYS WHO GUARD JABBA THE HUY. IN THAT MOVIE, RETURN OF THE JEDI> .
THATS HOW THEY ACTED AT THAT MOMENT. IN ESCORTING ME OUT OF THAT CANADIAN COURTROOM.
QUITE A KANAGAROO COURT.
WOW.
THATS WHAT IT OBVIOUSLY WAS. IN FACT IT WENT BEYOND THAT. LUNANCY. THATS WHAT THAT COURT WAS.
WHICH IS WHY I HAVE CHOSEN TO SUE .
I DESERVE COMPENSATION AT LEAST.
LOST WAGES. FOR THE WORK I HAD WITH THE MOVING COMPANY.
I AT LEAST DESERVE THAT. TECHNICALLY,
AFTER WHAT THE GOVERNMENT BROKE THIS MANY OF THEIR OWN LAWS I SHOULD SUE
THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT FOR MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
LOOK AT THE FACTS OF THIS SITUATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EVERYTHING I JUST WROTE HERE IS FACTUAL.
FACTUAL!!
DO YOU KNOW THE DEFINITION TO THE WORD 'FACT? ON THAT NOTE.
LISTEN TO THE FACTS!
I SHOULD SUE FOR MILLIONS ON THAT NOTE.
IT WOULD ALMOST BE A LACK OF JUSTICE IF I DID NOT!
LOOK AT THE FACTS!WHETHER YOUR NAME IS JUDGE REINER OR JUDGE LITTLE OR WHATEVER YOUR NAME IS.
THESE FACTS ADDRESSED HERE ARE STILL THAT. FACTS!
BUT, WHATEVER.
I'VE DECIDED I WILL BE SATISFIED IF I
AM COMPENSATED FOR THE LOST WAGES I INCURRED WHEN THE MINISTRY OF
TRANSPORTATION ILLEGALLY SUSPENDED MY DRIVERS LICENCE, ADMITTED TO ME
THAT THEY MADE A MISTAKE AND THEN , AFTER DOING THAT, DELIBERATELY
HIRED A LAWYER TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK. THAT
LAWYER WAS IN THE COURT ROOM THAT DAY.
and before the court case started, i
briefly saw the lawyer for the ministry of transporation mingling and
making small talk, cheerily with the judge who presided over my case
that day.
judge little.
and man, did he belittle the canadian court system that day.
with his lack of justice. displayed towards the laws addressed in canada.
incredible. the lawyer for the
ministry of transportation was mingling happily with judge little.
before court proceeded that day.
talk about being in cahouts perhaps? with corruption?
VERY STRANGE ON THEIR PART.
chatting together before court even commences. THAT DAY.
WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? ON THAT NOTE? I MEAN, HONESTLY?
BUT WHATEVER.
IF I RECALL , HIS NAME WAS JOHN PETRONOSIAK.
THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONS L.AWYER.
I MEAN.
ISN'T THAT TECHNICALLY BRIBERY?
YES. IT CLEARLY IS. AND AS FAR AS I
KNOW, BRIBERY IS AGAINST CANADAS LAWS. I'M PRETTY SURE I WAS IN A
CANADIAN COURT ROOM TOO. YES. I WAS. SO?
I DIDN'T HAVE MONEY FOR A LAWYER. SO I GOT NO JUSTICE. THATS WHAT THE JUDGE SAID TO ME THAT DAY.
SO IF I HAD MONEY TO HIRE A LAWYER THEN I COULD HAVE GOT JUSTICE.
MEANING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK.
ON AN ISSUE THAT THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONS EMPLOYEES ADMITTED TO
ME WAS THEIR FAULT TO BEGIN WITH. NOT MY FAULT.
BY WHICH FACTOR, TECHNICALLY, I WAS PREVENTED FROM HAVING PROPER EMPLOYMENT. FOR YEARS. AND A VARIETRY OF RELATIONSHIPS LOST.
AND MANY OTHER PROBLEMS AROSE.
UNNECCACVARY HARDSHIPS ON MANY FACETS OF LIFE. DUE TO BEING UNABLE TO
WORK. THROUGH NO FAULT OF MY OWN. COURTESY OF THE MINISTRY OF ONTARIOS
TRANSPORTATION.
AND BY WHICH FACTOR I WAS PREVENTED
FROM ASSISTING MY MOTHER WHEN SHE NEEDED HEALTH CARE. BY WHICH FACTOR MY
MOTHER DSIED HORRIBLY. IN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. IN LONDON ONTARIO.
WHEN SHE FELL ILL.
AND MANY OTHER HARDSHIPS BEFELL ME. DUE TO THEIR UNNECCACARY RIDICULOUS TECHNICALLY HYPOCRITRICAL MISTAKE.
HMMNNN?
WELL, OKAY , YO?
YO? YO?
YA KNOW?
OKAY.
PERHAPS I SHOULD GET SOMEONE TO HIRE A LAWYER FOR ME. AND SUE THE GOVERNMENTS MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION? THEN?
FOR 3 MILLION DOLLARS!?
LOOK AT THE FACTS! OF WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DID TO ME! HERE@!!
WHO COULD BLAME ME FOR SUING FOR THIS?
ESPECIALLY WHEN SO MANY OTHER PEOPLE HAVE SUED FOR SO MANY LESS THINGS!
AND GOT COMPENSATED MILLIONS! LIKE THE WOMAN WHO SPILT HOT COFFEE ON
HERSELF. BOUGHT FROM MCDONMALDS!
CLEARLY NOT MCDONALDS FAULT!@
YET THAT WOMAN GOT PAID MILLIONS! FOR A MISTAKE SHE MADE.
WOW.
IN MY CASE I'M INFINITELY RIGHT. SO
'IM NOT EVEN SURE THATS A GOOD COMPARISON. EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THE
GOVERNMENT DOESNT COMPENSATE THE PEOPLE THAT TECHNICALLY DESERVE
COMPENSATION!
BUT WHATEVER.
OKAY.
LETS GO THROUGH THE FACTS. PROPERLY. THAT WAY.
AND GIVE THE DECENT CITIZEN WHO
ASSISTS ME IN HIRING A LAWYER HALF MY SETTLEMENT. I WONDER IF JUDGE
LITTLE AND THE MINISTRY OF CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION WILL BE PLEASED IF I
DO THAT?
'
.
Bicycles are considered vehicles as part of the Act. Ontario Court of Justice ... the
Demerit Point System is for the regulation of motor vehicles; not for
cyclists.
You visited this page on 23/02/20.
It's the rare cyclist who doesn't at least bend the rules of the road. ... Demerit points
are part of the penalty for certain traffic infractions like excessive
speed, running red lights or distracted driving. ... Can your bike infraction affect your licence?
|
Feb 8, 2009 - There are laws that are very grey pertaining to motorized bikes ... You will no longer be permitted to drive a moped on any driver's licence. ... or even an 80cc, engine kits that are available could not be considered a motor ... around on because in Ontario right now even suspended drivers can operate one.
|
Jun 1, 2018 - Did you know that even when riding a
bicycle you can earn a traffic ticket ... Any ticket you get while
cycling should not result in
demerit points ..
Consolidation Period: From January 1, 2020 to the e-Laws currency date. ... Driving prohibited while licence suspended ... (c) that has no hand or foot operated clutch or gearbox driven by the motor and transferring power to the driven wheel, ... a power-assisted bicycle, a motorized snow vehicle, a traction engine, a farm ...
Jun 18, 2008 - Now, for many years, I have heard lots of reports about them trying to hand out
demerit points to those
cyclists who had a driver's license while ...
Apr 28, 2011 - But the
law defines a moped, with or
without optional pedal power, ... 30 mph and an
engine no bigger than 50cc that
does not require the ... Moped riders need a
driver's license, insurance and registration to be legal. ...
bike) riders
are suspended or
revoked for previous DUIs, (driving ...
Related to this story ...
Jun 17, 2017 - For the record, if you get a ticket while riding your bike, you're not supposed to get demerit points on your Ontario driver's license. Make sure the ticket notes it as a cycling infraction at the time that it is written.
If you get a ticket riding your bike, you're not supposed to get demerits on your Ontario driver's licence – as long as the ticket says you were on your bicycle, says Ontario's Ministry of Transportation. "Bicycle infractions are not applied to the driving record," says MTO spokesman Bob Nichols in an email.Jun 17, 2014
Aug 26, 2019 - When restricted to an attached electric (
no gas or diesel)
motor of not more ... km/h, our federal
laws state they don't require a licence, licence plates, ... a rider, by having the
engine work only when the
bike is being pedaled. ... In
Ontario, if you've had
your licence suspended for a criminal code ...
RELATED.
'''JUSTICE WILL BE BLIND TO HISTORY.
UNTIL WINDSWEPT LEAVES RETURN TO THE BARREN TREE.'''
QUOTATION CONNECTED TO 2ND PETER 1: 19-21.
|
NOTE JUST FOR THE APPROPRIATE SAKE OF RECORD.
IN CONNECTION TO 1ST CORINTHIANS 6: 1-3,
RIGHTEOUS BEINGS WHO HONOR JESUS CHRIST IN REAL DECENT TRUTH DO NOT
HONOR WICKED UNJUST JUDGMENTS. THE WHOLE CHRISTIAN BIBLE AS WELL AS ALL
OF THE WORDS OF JESUS CHRIST MAKE THAT STATEMENT THOROUGHLY CLEAR.
THATS FOR SURE.
Got it, thanks!
In
dealing with the government of canada,
and its peculiar contradictory
"" clearly
hypocritical laws," sometimes it's like playing
Russian
roulette. With a fortune teller.
Similar to this far side cartoon.
IN OTHER WORDS, SUCH A CARTOON REFLECTS THE FOLLOWING WORDS
ADDRESSED BY THIS WEBSITE WRITER.
WORDED AS FOLLOWS.
''MY GOD! I'VE PLACED MY TRUST IN THE
CANADIAN GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE DECENT LAWS!
DEVOID OF DELIBERATE HYPOCRISIES GALORE.
WHICH HAS RESULTED IN DISASTER . FOR THE WRITER OF THIS WEBSITE! .
. REGARDING THE WRITER OF THIS WEBSITE.
AND THE PREDICAMENT I RIDICULOUSLY UNJUSTLY FACE.
DUE TO THE OBVIOUS HYPOCRITICAL CORRUPTIONS OF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT,
THE ALL CANADIAN AUTHORITIES WHO DID NOT PROPERLY STAND UP
AGAINST SUCH A HYPOCRITICAL JUDGMENT EXACTED AGAINST THIS WEBSITE WRITER.
THAT ABOUT SUMS UP THIS SITUATION. ENTIRELY IN FACT.
'
Done.
|
HOLY JESUS.
I HAVE ENOUGH COMMON SENSE TO NOT GO CRAZY OVER THIS. BUT I UNDERSTAND UNFORTUNATELY HOW SOME CITIZENS DO GO CRAZY.
REFLECTIVE OF THE IMAGES BELOWWW.
WOW.
To the readers of this site. The following website addresses issues
which relate to the ministry of transportation in ontario Canada. ...
-
TO THE READERS OF THIS WEBSITE. THIS IS
AN APPEAL TO ANYBODY SENSIBLE READING THIS WEBSITE. AND 'ON THAT NOTE,
THE COMMENT SECTIO...
-
DRIVERS HANDBOOK ONTARIO. THE YEAR 2000.
ONE SECTION OF THE HAND BOOK RULES STATES THE FOLLOWING. AN
ONTARIO RESIDENT CANNOT HAV...
-
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. REGARDING THE MATTER
OF MY DRIVERS LICENCE SUSPENSION, SOMETIMES I FEEL, I COULD CRY OVER
THIS. THEN I TELL...
THE LINKS ATTACHED IN THE ABOVE POST CLEARLY CONFIRM THAT AN ONTARIO DRIVER CANNOT HAVE HIS OR HER DRIVERS LICENCE SUSPENDED FOR ANY FINE EXCEDPT A FINE WHICH PERTAINS UNTO A MOTOR VEHICLE.
I CLEARLY HAVE NEVER HAD A FINE RELATING TO A MOTOIR VEHICLE.
IN FACT, IN THE FOUR YEARS I DROVE UNDER MY DADS INSURANCE IN HIS CAR, AS A PART TIME DRIVER, I HAD A PERFECT DRIVING RECORTD.
WITH THE G 2 LICENCE.
AND FOR DRIVING PERFECTLY, I WAS REWARDED BY THE ONMTATIO MINSTRY AND GOVERNMENT, BY HAVING MY LICENCE SUSPENDED ILLEGALLY ON THEIR PARTS. THEY ACTUALLY ADMITTED THAT TO ME.
TO MY FACE. THEN , AFTER ADMITTING THAT, THEY SAID I HAD TO CORRECT THEIR MISTAKE. BY GOING TO COURT. AND EXPLAINING THEIR MISTAKE TO A JUDGE.
IN CANADA.
TO GET MY LIOCENCE BACK. INCREDIBLE.
i feel it mete 'ultimately' and correct to address it below. on that note. quoted as follows.
to dan.
I've decided to try and find someone, or a group of people to help me sue the government for emotional distress, and many other things.
I'll give
Whoever helps me with this half my SETTLEMENT.
If I win.
That means, if I sue for 3 million , you get 1. 5 million dollars Dan
Dan, I cant see how I'd lose.
If the judge is sane.
Or not corrupt.
Ya know?
I'll give
Whoever helps me with this half my SETTLEMENT.
If I win.
That means, if I sue for 3 million , you get 1. 5 million dollars Dan
Dan, I cant see how I'd lose.
If the judge is sane.
Or not corrupt.
Ya know?
its okay for the government to commit corruptions against their citizens. no sense in doing anything about it. thats okay.
Thanks for thinking of of me but I m not interested. Money won't buy stress free living.
I think everyone is stressed these days . Coronavirus, rumours of wars, weather changes , strikes , Etc etc
Bible prediction of last days . True peace is trusting in Jesus regardless of circumstances. I think you know what I m talking about.
Why not find a group of people that love God and Jesus and start being part of that group.
Thanks again and enjoy your evening.
Thanks for thinking of of me but I m not interested. Money won't buy stress free living.
I think everyone is stressed these days . Coronavirus, rumours of wars, weather changes , strikes , Etc etc
Bible prediction of last days . True peace is trusting in Jesus regardless of circumstances. I think you know what I m talking about.
Why not find a group of people that love God and Jesus and start being part of that group.
Thanks again and enjoy your evening.
but this is about doing the right thing. obviously.
to not take a stand against evil government officials is corrupt. and jesus does not approve of corruption.
to not take a stand against this, therefore, means, one is being a hypocritical christian.
and matthew 24: 51 clearly says that jesus christ does not approve of hypocrisy.
Jesus warns against going against morale justice.
That's hypocrisy.
everywhere in the christian scriptures jesus warns against hypocritical sin of that magnitude. thats obvious. john 5; 14, hebrews 6; 4-6, matthew 18: 7 etc. etc. etc.
Jesus condemns hypocrisy.
Matthew 24, 51.
On that note what the government did to me is entirely unjust.
And hypocritical.
I have every right to ask for justice here.
And compensation.
Every part of the words of jesus christ addressed to humanity make that clear.
If they suspended your DRIVERS licence illegally on their parts and then committed the same atrocities to you, and prevented you from helping your mother in hospital when she needed help, I'm sure youd want justice too.
Plus, if they prevented you from proper transportation for your work and family I'm sure youd say that's great guys!
To the government.
Right Dan.
Yiud praise the government and thank them.
If they did that to you.
For 22 years straight.
Right dan?
Let's speak truth.
Here.
Especially for the case of my dead mother.
Honor your mother.
Jesus says.
By taking my DRIVERS licence away they prevented me from helping my mother with her illness.
thats obvious.
Jesus would be the first to agree with me.
matthew 17. in summary fully.
all things applied to everything in this life fully summarized.
on that note
To not at least try to make the government be held accountable for such crimes which they committed against me would be hypocrisy on my part.
Jesus warns against hypocrisy in matthew 24, 51!
Obey jesus.
That's what true Christian's do, dan.
And
The government needs to be held accountable for deliberately committing such atrocities against me.
Lest they do it to others as well...
It's our christian duty to stand up and expose their evil here.
As the holy ghost tells true Christian's in ephesians 5, verse 11.
So the government cannot commit such evils against another canadian citizen.
Expose what they did to me.
Now.
As ephesians 5 verse 11 states.
Obviously.
Pure and simple.
I am honoring matthew 5, 17- 20 in connection to deuteronomy 28, verse 58, 59, by making a stand on this.
To not make a stand on this clearly mocks matthew 5, 17- 20.
I'm serious dan.
Jesus instructs true Christian's to stand up against corrupt governments that do not exercise decent justice.
To not do that mocks gods commandments.
And jesus said, what?
In Matthew 19, verse 17?
Jesus said "" if ye wish life in jesus then keep the commandments of god.
How do we show god we love god?
John 14, 15.
Pure and simple.
So you see?
For me to stand up and do this is the christian thing to do.
Obviously.
here.
now.
what kind of a crazy corrupt government tells their citizens that 'they made an error, regarding my drivers licence suspension, yet they couldn't correct the error? i had to go to court to explain their error? to a judge?
thats what the ministry of ontario and its government officials ridiculously told me.
so?
whats that? on their parts. if you tell a citizen of canada you made an error then you should correct the error.
meaning the government.
not me the canadian citizen. that ''too' is a good question.
regarding this situation addressed.
'the canadian government ridiculously prevented me, a canadian citizen, from proper transportation and prevented me from working for 23 years!
because my work required a drivers licence. when their was no rational reason, on their parts to do that to me!!!
great!
just great!!!!
how would they like that if that was done to them./
i was hired at 17 dollars an hour.
9 to 5 usually.
6 days a week. with double pay for over time work.
whatever that works out to over 23 years.
whatever number that is.
if that matters.
technically a decent government would compensate me for my lost wages regarding work.
in that regard.
the real point of this matter is the government prevented me from making a living. and being a useful canadian citizen and member of society. and they clearly did this to me for no good purpose. when they didnt have to do this to me.
thats the point.
they should be held accountable. so the government will, at least, decently make some kind of effort not to commit atrocities like this, to further canadians.
thats why i have decided to sue the government of canada for this.
thats for sure.
The christian bible does say " he who does not work, let him not eat either.
But that wasnt my fault, bill.
They illegally denied me the necessities of life.
The bible in many places affirms that.
They should be held accountable for that.
True Christian's acknowledge what the bible says.
Even luke 6, 45- 46 confirms that.
In fact, that's why I went to get my licence.
He told me, if I did that, hed hire me.
Because he liked me.
I swear by jesus, matthew 5, 17-20, and deuteronomy 10, verse 20 that's true bill.
As I explain in my bicycle website.
Deuteronomy 10, 20 connects to matthew 5 verses 17, 20.
In letting me speak truth.
In that way.
Either way, it's the truth.
For years.
Til my parents were dead.
Dead!!!
Who does that?
The government needs to be made accountable for this.
Do you think maybe a church group would band together and help me hire a lawyer , bill?
ITS CLEARLY THE CHRISTIAN THING TO DO. I'LL TELL YOU THAT. THE WHOLE CHRISTIAN BIBLE MAKES IT CLEAR TRUE CHRISTIANS HELP SOMEONE IN MY POSITION.
HIRE A LAWYER. TO STOP THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENT OF CANADA FROM DOING THIS TO ME. AND TO STOP FURTHER GENERATIONS OF GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES FROM DOING THIS. TOO. THATS OBVIOUS. EXPOSE THEM NOW. SO THEY CANT DO THIS TO FURTHER GENERATIONS.
OF CANADIANS.
If I win my case.
Look at the facts. A
JUDGE WOULD HAVE TO BE CORRUPT TO RULE against me.
THIS actually happened bill.
WhaT is wrong with the Canadian government authorities?
Wow.
HOLY JESUS.