The adventures of snel grove snail connected to the mysteries of this universe.

Truth is stranger then fiction in this life. TO THE READERS OF THIS WEBSITE PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING ARE LINKS ATTACHED. TO JOURNALS. WHICH APPL;Y TO THE FUNCTIONS OF THIS ADDRESSED WEBSITE. Due to a glitch in the functions of this website, I ask the readers to read the links first.

Connected to the following.

https://youtu.be/npuUHEuoN-Q
As this first post and its contents words over ride in various passages.
And paragraphs.
RELATING TO THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION IN ONTARIO CANADA. 

AND VARIOUS VERY CONTRADICTORY RULES AND REGULATIONS ON LAWS RELATED TO SUCH A SUBJECT WHICH NEED AN ADDRESS.

IN WRITING.

POST ONE.https://ouranus.blogspot.com/2020/03/hermaphroditusc2q45-friday-march-20.html?m=0

===========================================================================

https://ridingbikey.blogspot.com/2020/03/one-section-of-hand-book-rules-states.html

POST TWO.

===========================================================================

https://ridingbikey.blogspot.com/2020/03/to-readers-of-this-website.html
POST THREE.
==============================================================
https://ridingbikey.blogspot.com/2020/03/summarizing-my-drivers-licence-situation.html
POST FOUR.
==============================================================

TO THE READERS OF THIS WEBSITE.

THIS IS AN APPEAL TO ANYBODY SENSIBLE READING THIS WEBSITE.

AND 'ON THAT NOTE, THE COMMENT SECTIONS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE QUITE NOTABLE.

JUST FOR THE APPROPRIATE SAKE OF RECORD.

WOULD SOMEBODY 'PLEASE' LOOK AT THE FACTS ADDRESSED IN THIS WEBSITE?

truth

AND THEN HELP ME TAKE THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA TO COURT? 

FOR COMMITTING ATROCITIES AGAINST ME.

THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT HAS HAPPENED HERE.

PLEASE READ THE FACTS LOCATED IN THIS WEBSITE. TO SEE WHAT I REFER TO THERE.  AND A BRIEF NOTE. I INCLUDE IMAGES WHICH APPLY TO THIS SITE.

PLEASE IGNORE THE IMAGES , WHEN FIRST READING THIS SITE. THE READER WILL UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM SAYING BETTER IF THEY DO THAT FIRST.

In connection ultimately unto the following information

 addressed:

Summarizing my drivers licence situation with my family and the government. Regarding  Notes  On face book and other notes likewise... For records sake. Incredibly' everything addressed here is actually factual. I checked. Wtf? I'm positive of that. I've gone over the facts over and over. Hundreds of times. Its factual. Theirs no doubt. I even still have all the court documents. Too. That prove its factual.. Wow.

Summarizing my drivers licence situation with my family and the government. Notes  On face book.. For records sake.

First off 

To aunt ann.

My fathers younger sister.

I feel it expedient and neccacary that I send this.

I wrote to your sister.

''''Who is 

My 

Aunt margaret obviously ''''''

My dads younger  sister ' and in fact youngest sister also in this life

to adress some important facts.

After carefully evaluating the situation ' I feel it is neccacary to forward those emails to you.

On that note now'

To let you be aware of the true facts of such a situation likewise.

Regarding these notes which I've recently sent to her.

For the record .

Aunt ann ' if I could' ?

I would place the information I am about to send to you into one 'email specifically''

to avoid sending these notes in too many facebook letters.

But i do not have your email.

To do that obviously.

.

Every fact though ' verifies' 

if I did not send this information to you ' aunt Ann'

 it would be wrong on my part.

That is why I have decided to copy and paste and then send the letters I sent to aunt Margaret 'to you now.

Please read them carefully.

With the links' I am sending here . Too.

And also''' 

If you are able?

Send these notes to aunt sandra and uncle rense and aunt alice.

Because I believe the facts presently  impute these notes I' am sending you'  its logical  'the whole family should be made  aware of.

Thank you aunt ann.

And I wish you a lovely day on that note.

P.s.

I am now about to send those letters.

That I've already sent to aunt margaret.

Please note that 

It may take a bit of space .

Maybe about ten letters?

I'm not sure?

Maybe?.

Because facebook does not permit us to write beyond a certain amount of words to one post or letter.

Okay?

Thank you aunt ann' on that note.

And have a great day.

Love kerry.

Okay. Bare with me 'here' aunt ann. 

My quess is I'll have to condense the letters I sent to aunt margaret '

Into about ten messages on facebook.

Starting with the following.

Dear aunt marg.

please send these links to aunt alice and uncle rense for evaluation. 

🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈

https://ridingbikey.blogspot.com/2020/03/drivers-handbook-ontario.html

🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈

its simply wrong what the government did to me in this.

☃️☃️☃️☃️☃️☃️☃️☃️☃️☃️

https://ridingbikey.blogspot.com/2020/03/summarizing-my-drivers-licence-situation.html

🌋🌋🌋🌋🌋🌋🌋🌋🌋🌋

As the facts of these links verify ultimately.

🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌎🌏

https://ridingbikey.blogspot.com/2020/03/to-readers-of-this-website.html

🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎

https://ridingbikey.blogspot.com/2020/03/one-section-of-hand-book-rules-states.html

🏗🏗🏗🏗🏗🏗🏗🏗🏗🏗

 and ' just for the sake of record""i will pay half my settlement to whoever helps me take these horrific judicial authority figures to court.

Evaluating facts properly.

 i intend to sue for two million dollars. by hiring me a lawyer. if everyone chipped in it could be done. couldnt it?

You see what I am """up against"" here' aunt mzrg?

Are you reading the facts?

The government needs to be held accountable for what they did to me.

My dad agreed. But when me and my dad asked jeff and winnie for help in this' jeff and winnie refused to help.

Though they were quite able to.

And it was clearly the right thing for them to do.

That's wh I'm baffled at jeff and winnie.

Aunt marg

P.s.

I worked it out ON PAPER.

17.00 dollars an hour.

6 days a week.

And that's not even including the overtime I wss promised EQUALS over 1.1 million dollars so far.

At least that.

Plus emotional suffering.

Plus both my dad and mom could have benefited from certain medical procedures when they were dying in hospital so medical Bill's were a requirement.

Plus a lost relationship with a lady I was dating.

Because we felt I wasnt in a position to raise a family if I didnt have a car.

Plus many other situations rose from the governments incompetence in suspending my licence illegally and then not correcting their mistake.

Technically' when all things are properly analysed needed drivers licence.

It was a neccesity.

And jeff and winnie know this.

So that's why i believe jeff and winnie did what they did.

Somewhere along the line'in this life'they became cold towards what jesus teaches humans in matthew 5' 6 and 7...

Where jesus says"" if someone asks for help  help them.

Evaluating my brothers statements fairly and truthfully.

With common sense.

To aunt ann.

My brother jeff just said this.

'''''Kerry' why didnt you just get another job''?

So I responded like this.

.

"""Jeff.   

Many decent job opportunities occurred.

During the last 30 years.

Yet not one decent job oppurtunity arose in the last 30 years that didnt require a '  g drivers licence.

You see? Jeff?

That's the real issue at hand here. .

Jeff.

Also

You couldnt have raised a family if you didnt have a drivers licence or car.

Jeff.

To drive your family around to various neccacary events.

As well as take care of your family properly.

That's how it is on earth presently.

Connected to luke 16: 9 to 11

And you know it.

You know damn well that's true.

Jeff.

And you know full well that I couldnt make it work without a drivers licence neither.

Jeff..

Neither could you raise a family if you worked in retail at minimum wage.

You  clearly  prevaricate and lie a lot though.

By saying you could.

But that's not what you said to me and dad when you made dad walk home on an injured leg All the way from 1003 woodhaven road to 202 mcnay street.

Simply because you said your cars back tire was way more important then dads injured leg.

Jeff.

Obviously.

Regarding those matters you obviously lie.

In many ways.

That's obvious.. .

Just look closely at these text messages in their full context for confirmation to that statement just addressed.

Pay attention jeff. I'm trying to be merciful here.

By clarifying truth...

You claim you had a job so you saved money when you were young.

But you never paid rent or hydro Bill's at home.

Did you,..

That makes a huge difference in a situation.

And I never had that opportunity.

It just worked ot that way.

Like you and winnie did.

You know that.

Yet you never decently truthfully acknowledge that obvious truth either."""""

That's what I said to jeff.

🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽⛲🗽⛲🌏

So

See?

Aunt margaret?

So?

In summary that also verifies I'm right.

The government is infinitely lacking in justice for doing what they did in suspending my licence.

And they need to be held accountable for it.

Lest they do it to someone else too.

AND 'IM NOT KIDDING.

AUNT MARGARET.

MY BROTHER JEFF?

WHEN MY DAD WAS 87 YEARS OLD.

ME AND MY DAD WENT TO JEFFS PLACE TO CELEBRATE JEFFS BIRTH DAY.

AS A KIND GESTURE.

THOUGH MY DAD HAD AN INJURED LEG.

AND WAS HOBbLING.

WE WENT ALL THE WAY OUT THERE .

JEFF SENT MY DAD WALKING HOME ON AN INJURED LEG.

ON FEBRUARY 15TH. 2017.

JEFFS BIRTHDAY.

BECAUSE JEFF SAID HE WAS ON HIS WAY OUT SOON TO PICK UP A FRIEND FOR A BIRTHDAY PARTY HE WAS HAVKNG WITH HISFRIENDS IN ABOUT TWO HOURS.

SO WE COULDNT COME INTO HIS HOUSE.

HE LEFT US ON THE PORCH.

HE DIDNT LET ME OR MY DAD IN TO THE HOUSE.

HE TOLD US TOLEAVE.

WITH THE REMARK TO MY DAD AND ME THAT 

JEFFS BACK TIRE ON HIS CAR WAS SLIGHTLY DAMAGED.

SO JEFF COULDNT RISK DRIVING MY DAD HOME.

DESPITE THE FACT MY DAD TOLD JEFF THAT HIS LEG WAS  SORE.

AND ASKED JEFFFOR A LIFT BACK HOME TO 202 MCNAY STREET.

JEFF HAD TO USE THE CAR IN ABOUT TWO HOURS.

TO PICK UP A FRIEND OF HIS.

SURE.

SO HE WAS WILLING TO USE THE CAR FOR THAT.

BUT NOT TO HELP DAD.

JEFFS BACK TIRE ON HIS CAR WAS WAY MORE IMPORTANT THEN MY DADS INJURED  RIGHT LEG.

I SWEAR BY DEUTERONOMY 10: 20 AND MATTHEW 5: 17 TO 20 AND THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST THAT HAPPENED.

THE SAME AS HOW JEFF INSTRUCTED HIS KIDS TO CALL MY FATHER JIM.

INSTEAD OF GRAND PA.

BECAUSE MY DAD TOLD JEFF AND HIS KIDS TO OBEY THE BIBLES OLD PARTS ONE DAY BACK IN 2010.

OO IF YOU SAW HOW RUDE JEFF HAD BEEN TO MY DAD OVER THE YEARS.

AUNT MARG.

ITS TRULY ASTONISHING...

BUT ANYWAYS.

SO?

SEE AUNT MARGARET?

JEFFHYPOCRITICALLY SAYS TO ME THAT I COULD SUPPORT A FAMILY ON MIMINUM WAGE.

WITHOIT A CAR.

WHEN JEFF DID THAT TO MY DAD?

ONFEBRYARY 15TH 2017?

SEE?

AUNT MARGARET?

HOW DECEPTIVE JEFF IS?

In that?

And """just for the appropriate sake of record""?

My sister told her kids to disrespect my dad by calling him """""jim.""""""

Instead of grand pa.

As well.

Why did winnie do that?

Because lydia had told my father she was a lesbian.

And my dad told lydia that was wrong.

Lydia and my dad began to argue about it.

Then lydia told winnie that my dad told her that she had to repent of lesbianism and ask jesus to correct her.

My sister was offended with my dad at that point and told her kids they didnt have to call my dad grand pa if they didnt want to.

Simply because my dad tried to teach lydia the truth of the bible.

So winnie dishonored my dad and the bible by telling her kids not to honor their grand father that way.

And from that point on '.....jeff and winnie told their kids to disrespectfully call my dad "" JIM.

and not grand pa.

I'm not kidding.

Aunt margaret.

If I had children in this life 

I would have never disrespected my dad that way by telling my kids to call my dad " Jim's and not grand pa.

But that's what jeff and winnie did.

Aunt margaret.

I'm telling you the truth.

So'

When you read the facts I address here?

Jannesmemories.blogspot.com 

Siblingsfromhell.blogspot.com

Supercilioussiblings.blogspot.com

Please remember that.

Another thing that shocks me?

The laws of ontario and canada say this.

NO CANADIAN CITIZEN CAN HAVE HIS OR HER DRIVERS LICENCE TAKEN AWAY FOR ANY FINE EXCEPT A FINE WHICH PERTAINS UNTO A MOTORIZED VEHICLE.

AUNT MARGARET.

I DO NOT HAVE A FINE THAT IS RELATED TO A MOTORIZED VEHICLE.

ONLY FINES WHICH HAVE TO DO WITH A BICYCLE.

WHEN I WAS A TEENAGER.

A BICYCLE DOES NOT HAVE A MOTOR.

SEE?

AUNT MARGARET.

WHEN I INFORMED THE AUTHORITIES IN CANADA THAT THIS WAS THE CASE THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY HAD MADE A MISTAKE AND BROKEN THEIR OWN LAWS IN SUSPENDING MY DRIVERS LICENCE.

YET ' DESPITE THE FACT THEY WERE CLEARLY IN THE WRONG IN THIS MATTER'THEY REFUSED TO CORRECT THEIR CRIMINAL ACT COMMITTED AGAINST ME.

THEY TOLD ME I HAD TO GO TO A CANADIAN COURT TO EXPLAIN TO A CANADIANJUDGE THEIR CRIME WHICH THEY COMMITTED AGAINST ME.

THATS OUTRAGEOUS ON THEIR PART.

AND 

Aunt margaret?

Many government officials continually  sent me on wild goose CHASES accross various sections of  the province of ontario  to various government offices over the last 24 years telling me' maybe this place could help.

But when I got there's it was always the same answer.

They couldnt help me with a lawyer because I wasnt charged with a criminal offence.

So everywhere I went government officials told me I was right  in this matter and they shouldnt have suspended my licence.

But they said " because their error they made in suspending my licence  was already in the courts computer system'''

I'd have to take the matter to court.

Yet I couldn't take the matter to court.

Because I had no money for a lawyer.

So?

They all told me " they made a mistake' in suspending my licence.

But unless I paid a lawyer money to represent me to explain their mistake ' I wouldnt receive justice.

In getting my licence back.

So?

In other words?

Every government official told me I had to pay money in order to get justice.

In this matter.

Isnt that atrocious bribery?

On their part?

Or' they said' if I wanted them to help me hire a lawyer ''' I would have to break the law.

So they told me if I become a criminal then I would be entitled to legal aid.

And the government would pay a lawyer to defend me.

So I could receive justice .

But as long as I was a law abiding citizen and not a criminal?

I would receive no justice in this matter of my drivers licence...

I HAD WORK ALL READY...

I WAS READY TO START WORK.

ON A MONDAY.

22 YEARS AGO.

I TOLD THE GOVERNMENT TO JUST LET ME START WORK AND I COULD PAY MY FINES EASILY.

THE GOVERNMENT SAID " NO." FIRST THEY WANTED ME TO PAY MY FINES WITH MONEY I DID NOT HAVE.

YOU NEED WORK TO MAKE MONEY.

SEE?

HOW THEY SCREWED ME?

AUNT MARGARET.

THIS IS CRIMINAL INFINITELY WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DID TO ME.

IS EVERYONE AROUND ME WHOSE LISTENING TO THIS' CRAZY?

AUNT MARGARET?

THESE PEOPLE NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR COMMITTING THESE CRIMES AGAINST ME!

If I can get these crazyjoksters into a court of law on this?

I'll easily sue the government for 4 million.

No righteous judge would rule against me.

That's for sure.

The problem is getting these crazy AUTHORITY  people into court.

They wont face me in a court room.

Unless I hire a lawyer.

Their crazy .

Aunt Margaret.

I'm not the crazy one.

Here.

Aunt margaret.

Look at the facts.

JESUS SAW ALL THIS?

WOW.

HOLY JESUS.

And what's even more frustrating?

They did this to me.

For all these years.

And committed all these deliberate hypocritical actions.

Against me.

Regarding my drivers licence.

And people think I should be calm?

In this subject?

Jesus says in matthew 24: 51 that 'hypocrites who do what the government did to me in these matters "" have no rights in heaven or on earth or in hell.

And what's more?

Aunt margaret?

The righteous biblical men 

Elijah and moses and david and joshua 

Killed evil people on earth for far less crimes committed by people living on earth in the days of the biblical men elijah and david and joshua and moses.

And jesus does say in 

Matthew 5: 17 to 20 that I need to honor deuteronomy 28's functions .

So?

Do we disobey jesus? In that regard?

Interesting question? Connected to matthew 19: 17 and luke 6: 45' 46.

Eh?

Aunt margaret?

On that note  PSALM 149: 5 to 9 and jude 1: 14 are written for rational purposes.

Through 2nd peter 1: 19 to 21 and  CHRISTIANITYS holy ghost.

Please forgive me for writing again on this matter aunt marg.

But I feel this should also be clarified.

The laws in the canadian constitution also  state  " for the appropriate sake of record' that 

"""""any canadian citizen has the right to defend himself or herself in a canadian court of law 

ON ANY MATTER RELATING TO A CANADIAN COURT CASE ' as long as 6 months have passed' which brought the case to a matter of law in the first place regarding canadas laws and judicial systems.""""""""

Meaning courts.

Well' aunt marg?

When I finally went to court on that matter?

At least a year and a half  had passed since the matter had been brought to the attention of canadas courts.

So?

Obviously that's more then 6 months.

So when that judge told me he wasnt going to hear my case and give me justice unless I paid a lawyer money to represent me?

I mentioned that to that judge.

And ya know what that heathen judge said?

He said he didnt care that the canadian judicial systems and canadas laws gave  me the right to defend myself in a court of law in Canada on the matter of my drivers licence.

He said he was going to defy canadas laws in that regard.

And not give me justice in the matter of the ministry of transportation criminally  suspending my licence for no just reason on their parts.

And what's even weirder?

I actually saw that judge laughing and joking with the lawyer for the ministry of transportation.

At the front of the court room.

Before my court case regarding my illegally suspended drivers licence came up..

That clearly means they were in cahoots.

And not only that.

The corrupt lawyer for the ministry of transportation """JOHN PETROSIAK"""

who was representing the ministry on their behalf told the judge'whose name was judge little"" that I hadn't filed the statement of claim or the notice of motion..

To proceed with the case.

So'i stood up and lifted the papers I had in the court room to prove I had proof I did file the statement of claim and notice of motion to proceed with my case.

To which that corrupt judge said that he didnt care if I had proof the lawyer for the ministry of transportation was committing perjury in his court.

That judge sinfully said he wasnt going to hear my case unless I gave a lawyer money.

Correct me if I'm wrong 'aunt margaret?

But that's obviously a bribe.

Right?

If  you were the judge's in that court room'aunt marg' and you say to me' your not going to give me justice regarding  my suspended drivers licence unless I give a lawyer friend of yours money's,;; isnt that bribery?

See aunt margaret?

See what I'm saying?

So that corrupt judge committed at least three felonies against canadas laws.

Right in his court room.

That day.

The first felony  is grand theft over thousand dollars.

As my lost employment or  work amounts to 1.1 million dollars far in compensation money.

The second is perjury.

Because the judge defended the prevaricating actions of the corrupt lawyer for the ministry of transportation regarding the statement of claim and notice of motion...

The third is BRIBERY.

Obviously.

And as far as I know?

If you commit even one of 

All 3 of  those felonies?

You could be sentenced to at least 10 years in federal prison..

.

So?  .

See?

Aunt margaret?

The wicked evils that these people did to me?

This is absurd on their parts.

Show quoted text

I still have the papers.

Too.

That I had in court.

That day.

22 years ago.

To prove all this I say here is accurate.

Show quoted text

And why?

WHY?

WHY?

DID THEY DO THIS TO ME?

ITS TOTALLY ABSURD.

THEIR COMPLETELY UNJUST.

Show quoted text

I SWEAR TO YOU BY WAY OF WHAT JESUS INSTRUCTSCME TO IN MATTHEW 5: 17 TO 20 CONNECTED TO DEUTERONOMY 10: VERSE 20' WHERE JESUS SAYS SWAER BY THE NAME OF THE LORD THAT EVERYTHING IVE WRITTEN TO YOU HERE IN THESE EMAILS IS TRUTH.

AUNT MARGARET.

SO' .....GOOD..

 GOD.......

CONNECTED TO 1ST COR  6: 1 TO 3' ....

THIS ISNT A  RIGHTEOUS  CANADIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

ULTIMATELY' WHAT IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY' IS GOING ON HERE?

WITH ALL THIS?

AUNT MARGARET?

HOLY FREE HOLY.

YA KNOW?

HONESTLY.

AUNT MARG.

IS IT PSALM 149: 5 TO 9 AND ST. JUDE 1: 14 CONNECTED TO 2ND PETER 3: 7 TO 17?

THATS HAPPENING HERE?

WITH THESE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS?

ON EARTH.

CONNECTED TO THESE LAWS ON EARTH THAT PRESENTLY MOCK WHAT JESUS SAYS IN MATTHEW 5: 17 TO 20 AND 2ND KINGS 17: 25 TO 37 COMPLETELY.

IS IT?

WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE?

EITHER WAY THESE CANADIAN  GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY FIGURES SPECIFICALLY NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS THEYVE COMMITTED AGAINST ME OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS.

TO NOT MAKE THEM GIVE AN ACCOUNT OF THEIR HORRIFIC DECEPTIVE CRIMES THEYVE COMMITTED AGAINST ME THESE PAST 30 YEARS AMOUUNTS TO COMPLETE  HYPOCRISIES GALORE .

Show quoted text

OOO?

AND ONE LAST THING.

AUNT MARG.

CANADAS AUTHORITY FIGURES ARE WILLING TO HELP ME HIRE A LAWYER IF IM A CRIMINAL.

BUT THEIR NOT WILLING TO HELP ME HIRE A LAWYER IF IM INNOCENT?

IN A MATTER SUCH AS THIS?

SEE?

AUNT MARG?

SOMETHINGS GOT TO BE DONE.

TO ADDRESS THESE LAWS.

AND 

CANADAS GOVERNMENT AND AURHORITY FIGURES NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIS.

ASAP.

LEST THIS SORT OF ATROCIOUS HYPOCRISY CONTINUE.

CONNECTED TO WHAT JESUS WARNS HUMANS OF IN MATTHEW 24: 51.

AND JOB 8: 13.

AND ISIAH 9: 17.

LEST CANADAS WICKEDAUTHORITY FIGURES DO THIS TO SOMEONE ELSE.

MY CASE NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.

Show quoted text

Okay.

That's the factual  information I had to send . 

Aunt ann.

Please take it slow. And  check the facts.

When you can.

And if you are able to' send this factual  information to uncle rense and aunt alice.

Though

I understand aunt sandra is like my dad.

She doesnt have a computer.

So' maybe 'if you get a chance' speak with aunt sandra about this in person.

Thank you.

Love kerry.

To my aunts Margaret ' Alice'a

Ann and sandra.

Please note this also.

On this matter.

Which is simply this.

When all the facts of this matter are evaluated properly the following statements are very correct and accurate.

If these corrupt government and canadian authority figures are permitted to get away with this 'injustice','''

It amounts to a lack of justice  that is very horrific.

And absolutely criminal.

On the part of canadas JUDICIAL authority figures.

In many ways.

Canadas courts should not be evil like that.

Or stand for corruption.

That is why I am asking you guys' and other family members for help in this matter.

If everyone in the family chipped in just a little' to hire me a lawyer's I can force these people to face me in a court of law then I can also present this matter to the courts in order to stop the courts of canada from doing this

To someone else 

Down the line.

In canada.

Too.

Which is also the right thing to do.

Obviously.

Pure and simple.

Dear aunt alice and uncle oscar.  

I suppose this needs to be addressed.

So I'll write it down...

QUICK QUESTION.

REGARDING  christianity and  LUKE 12: 1TO 3 AND ALSO MATTHEW 10: 26 TO 27.

Specifically.

IS JESUS RIGHTEOUS FOR  SAYING HE AND HIS GODHEAD  'MEANING THE FATHER AND HOLY GHOST IN CHRIST ARE VIRTUOUSLY  GOING TO EXPOSE ALL EVIL WORKERS 

AND ALSO EXPOSE EVERYTHING EVENTUALLY?

SO ITS BESTNOT TO HIDE ANYTHING?

OF COURSE JESUS IS RIGHT.

IN THAT REGARD.

AND WE DO NOT RANK ABOVE JESUS IN THAT REGARD TO THE POINT WHERE WE DISOBEY LUKE 12: 1 TO 3.

RIGHT?

EXACTLY.

SO?

NOW   "" KEEPING THAT STATEMENT IN MIND' PLEASE NOTE THAT

THIS WEBSITE IVE WEITTEN IS BASED IN FACTS.

3RD-AEON-SOPHIA.BLOGSPOT.COM 

I CHECKED.

I HUMBLY SAY TO YOU' ON THAT NOTE' 

NEVER BETOO QUICK TO COME TO A CONCLUSION' UNI YOUVE CHECKED SOMEONES FACTS.

THANK YOU.

LOVE KERRY.

P.S.

OOO AND LOOK CLOSELY AT 

THE FACTS I ADDRESSHERE TOO.

Sacred-star-spirit.blogspot.com 

That website I've written?

Right there?

People need to note the truth of 

That websites facts.

In order to defeat the deceptive lies of satan and all evil spirits presently on earth.

Everything I write I write in that website?

Regarding the parousia in christianity or rather the second coming of jesus 'the rapture and the millennium or rather thousand yearreign of christ on earth with his saints whose with christ at the first resurrection of christianity in this life in 641 ad?

 

It's all factual.

Likewise.

Trust me.

Uncle oscar and aunt alice.

I checked the facts.

Connecting the time lines of christian prophesy with human history.

Over and over.

Its factual.

Trust me.

I'm just saying.

I'm rationally quoting facts to all humanity in that website.

As I do with all my websites.

Everything I write in my websites is clearly factual.

If someone checks my facts they'll see that truth VERACIOUSLY.

And '''what is the DEFINITION to a fact?

On that note?

The definition to a"" fact" according to a human dictionary?

Why's fact means someone is addressing truth .

Uncle oscar and aunt alice.

Exactly.

What a surprise. 

JUST FOR THE RECORD?

A fact means truth.

Exactly.

What a surprise.

Exactly.

Pure and simple.

Truth.

Please note that uncle oscar and aunt alice.

Thank you for addressing this letter on that note.

Love kerry.

Look at the facts.

To uncle rense' aunt ann aunt margaret aunt alice and aunt sandra.

Please 

Look closely  at what i present here in writing.

Look at what is  presented here.

Summarize facts sincerely appropriately  and truthfully.

Just for the appropriate sake of record please note this.

This is ridiculously evil and sinfully  unjust on the part of canadas courts.

I clearly didnt do anything wrong for the government to take my drivers licence away.

And I was starting a job on a monday when I received a notice from the government that my licence was suspended for bicycle fines.

The government told me afterwards that they admitted to me that they illegally suspended my drivers licence.

And then they dont correct a mistake like that???

I already explained that.

In detail.

In the preceding notes.

What the government did to me in this is totally hypocritical .

Way worse in deceptive hypocrisies actually then even most pharisees of the days of jesus.

And I'll tell you this much.

When jesus saw how evil the pharisees were in this life he very much got rude with them .

He did way more then that.

In matthew 24: 51.

Look how jesus  rudely cursed the pharisees.

Horrifically damming them for their deceptive hypocrisies 

In matthew 24: 51.

I was polite with these people until they proved they were hypocrites beyond measure' aunt alice.

After they proved to me they were HYPOCRITES beyond all measure'I finally decided to do what jesus instructs me to do in matthew 5: 17 to 20.

Connected to deuteronomy 28.

Just like galatians 1: 8 to 1st cor. 11: 1 and 1st corinthians 16: 22 warn all humans.

And aunt alice?

Look at those scriptures?

That's clearly what jesus COMMANDS me to do.

In such a situation.

Your not going to hold it against me for obeying jesus in that regard.

Right?

Look closely at the facts.

I've looked over the facts.  As far as I can see?

All rational logic verifies I'm quite correct in everything I say here.

That means 

No righteous judge would rule against me in this subject of my drivers licence.

In allowing me compensation for the unneccacary  difficultiesand hardships  the government of canada and its officials have so ridiculously forced me to endure' for no rational reason on their parts for ' going on' over 23 years now.

23 years!

That's crazy evil and totally unjust on the part of canadas clearly hypocritical   law officials .

I also  intend to pay 'whoever helps me hire a lawyer'  so I can get these evil terrible jokesters into a court of law' 

Half my settlement.

And I intend to sue for 3 million  dollars.

That means whoever helps me hire a lawyer will receive 1.5million.

When I get my settlement.

To aunt margaret aunt alice aunt sandra and aunt ann as well as uncle rense.

If you put your money together to help  me hire a lawyer in this

Then that means you get a lot of money back in return

1.5 million 5 ways is a lot.

I ask because the facts clearly state the evil government of canada wont face me in a court case to give me justice in this matter unless I have a lawyer present in court.

Pleasee   think about what I ask here on that note.

Thank you.

Love Kerry.

https://sweetidioticcontradictions.blogspot.com/2020/12/properly-categorizing-and-referring-to.html

https://youtu.be/tX5Scbxp4-Y 

Previous letter edited .

For spelling errors.

https://youtu.be/tX5Scbxp4-Y

I talked with a lawyer recently about my drivers licence and court case.
He implied the same thing you did aunt alice.

He asked me if I had been perfectly polite with the government.
I  told him I had been perfectly polite until it became clear the government was deliberately  being corrupt ..
Then'
After a long time of me dealing with their deceit i finally became upset with them.

Like any rational person would. 

Then the lawyer actually told me i was probably nuts like my father.
That rude lawyer told me my father had been institutionalized.

And the reason why the government probably choose to screw  me over was because they thought my father was crazy.

So they figured I was crazy.

That's what the lawyer told me aunt alice.

So they illegally suspended my drivers licence on their parts 'for that reason...

So I went to this lawyer for advice.
And help.
And instead of helping me the lawyer says something terrible and evil like that.

Dont you think that's evil of a government official to do that?

Along with the rest of the government aunt alice?

I'm beginning to understand now why psalmn149: 5 to 9''' 2nd peter 3" 7 to 17 and matthew 7: 13 to 14 are written..
People are so horribly deceitful....

Obviously they are.

..

And then when you call them on their obvious  evils they do to me '''they say my dad was nuts..
So they had the right to break their own laws and illegally take my licence?

Because they said my dad was nuts?

For no good reason.?

How does that give them the right to break their own laws?

By illegally suspending my drivers licence?

Which they clearly did.

By the way.
Aunt alice?

If that lawyer actually was speaking truth..?
Regarding that lawyer telling me my father had been in the london hospital?

So that's why the government illegally took my licence?

This situation gets more silly as time goes on.

Aunt alice.

LOOK AT THE IMAGES AFTER. THANK YOU.

ALSO I WISH TO SAY THIS. BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE.
ADDRESSED BELOW .
AND WORDED AS FOLLOWS.

THOUGHT.- IF THE TRUTH BE KNOWN, 


CANADAS PRESENT LAWS ARE TECHNICALLY CRAZY. THIS WEBSITES


 OBVIOUS FACTS PROVE THAT 


STATEMENT TO BE ACCURATE.


AND PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT TOTALLY


 RATIONAL FOLLOW LAWS THAT 

ARE CRAZY.


THATS OBVIOUS.

 AND ON THAT NOTE I'LL SAY THIS.
YOU KNOW WHAT.? ON A PERSONAL NOTE 
  I'D ASSUME, ONLY SOMEONE WITH A TIME MACHINE COULD HAVE INSTITUTED


 SUCH CRAZY LAWS IN CANADA PRESENTLY.

TO THE READER. READ THIS WEBSITE TO SEE WHAT I MEAN BY THAT STATEMENT.

I'M NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE FUNCTIONS OF TIME TRAVEL. IN THIS WEBSITE.

BUT MY POINT IS, 'TECHNICALLY SPEAKIUNG, DELIBERATELY EVILCRAZY PEOPLE INSTITUTE LAWS THAT ARE CORRUPT.


THATS WHY I SAY THAT. I'M SUSPICIOUS. SOMETHING DOESN'T ADD UP HERE.
 IN CANADA.

.

BECAUSE CANADAS PRESENT LAWS IN MANY WAYS ARE NOT
INSTITUTED RIGHTEOUSLY. READ THIS WEBSITE FOR A BEGINNERS
 LESSON ON THAT STATEMENT.

EINSTEIN NEVER SAID TIME TRAVEL WAS IMPOSSIBLE. EINSTEIN SAID
YOU HAVE TO SUPERCEDE  THE SPEED OF LIGHT TO MASTER TIME TRAVEL.
MANY FACETS OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY TODAY CAN DO THAT.

THATS OBVIOUS. WHEN A PERSON LOOKS AT THE FACTS OF EVERYTHING

 IN THIS LIFE PRESENTLY. 

MANY FACETS OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY TODAY CAN DO THAT.

THATS OBVIOUS. WHEN A PERSON LOOKS AT THE FACTS OF EVERYTHING

 IN THIS LIFE PRESENTLY. 

PERFECTLY CLEAR AND PERFECTLY SIMPLE.

AND ON THAT NOTE I BEGIN THE FACTUAL ADDRESSED CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE.

500 x 373 · jpeg

blogspot.com

• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 

click this link to video.
n

980 x 802 · jpeg

hostaccommodation.co.nz

• 
 
• 
 
• 

MUSIC OPTION-CLICK HERE

AND ON THAT NOTE I BEGIN THE FACTUAL ADDRESSED CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE.

AND ON THAT NOTE I BEGIN THE FACTUAL ADDRESSED CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE.

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. REGARDING THE MATTER OF MY DRIVERS LICENCE SUSPENSION, SOMETIMES I FEEL, I COULD CRY OVER THIS.

THEN I TELL MYSELF NOT TO CRY. BECAUSE IT DOESNT DO ANY GOOD TO CRY.

BUT WHATEVER. ANYWAYS.  YES. WHATEVER. SO
I CARRY ON. SO I CARRY ON.

SO NOW,  ANYHOW. NOW, 
 IN
SUMMARIZING MY DRIVERS LICENCE SITUATION.
ONCE AGAIN I MUST NOW SAY THIS.
AW YES.


THE FOLLOWING MUST BE ADDRESSED IN WRITING. NOT THAT I HAVEN;'T ADDRESSED THESE MATTERS BEFORE. BUT ANYWAYS HERE I GO IN ADDRESSING THE FACTS OF THIS SITUATION AGAIN. WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ADDRESSED.

FIRST, I GOT MY DRIVERS LICENCE- G LICENCE IN 1999 A D.

OR 2000.






ONE OF THOSE TWO YEARS.

ANYWAYS, TO SUMMARIZE THIS SITUATION, I BORROWED A LOT OF MONEY, TO GET MY DRIVERS LICENCE. MONEY I COULD NOT PAY BACK BECAUSE THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION ILLEGALLY SUSPENDED MY DRIVERS LICENCE FOR BICYCLE FINES.

I PROVED THIS TO THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION IN PERSON.

I WENT TO THEIR OFFICE. ON EXETER ROAD. IN LONDON ONTARIO.

AND SPOKE PERSONALLY FACE TO FACE WITH A LADY. AND A MAN.




WORKING THERE.

AND AFTER EXPLAINING MY SITUATION TO THEM, THEY STATED TO ME, IT APPEARED I WAS CORRECT.

THEY HAD SUSPENDED MY DRIVERS LICENCE ILLEGALLY. 

BUT THEY COULDN'T CORRECT THE SITUATION.

THEY SAID THAT.

BECAUSE, THEY SAID, THE RECORDED SUSPENSION WAS ALREADY IN THE SYSTEM RECORDS ON THEIR COMPUTERS.






SO, THEY SAID, I HAD TO GO TO A COURT TO CORRECT THEIR MISTAKE.

THEY BROKE THE LAW. BY TAKING AWAY MY DRIVERS LICENCE ILLEGALLY ON THEIR PARTS.

BUT I HAD TO FIX THEIR MISTAKE.

''''HUH?'''' I SAID.

THEY CHOOSE TO WASTE MY TIME, IRRATIONALLY, FOR NO GOOD REASON. SO I LOST WORK .

I ALSO LOST MY EMPLOYMENT. BECAUSE THE GENTLEMAN WHO PROMISED TO HIRE ME WHEN I GOT MY DRIVERS LICENCE SAID HE NEEDED TO HIRE SOMEONE. BECAUSE HE HAD TO.

FOR HIS BUISNESS. HE COULDNT WAIT ANOTHER YEAR. HE HAD CLIENTS WHO NEEDED HIM THEN. NOT A YEAR FROM THEN.

OOO? I SAID. REALLY? YOU CANT WAIT ANOTHER YEAR SIR? AND PUT YOUR BUISNESS ON HOLD FOR ME? BECAUSE THEMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT ILLEGALLY SUSPENDED MY DRIVERS LICENCE.

AND THEN DIDN'T CORRECT THEIR OWN MISTAKE? OOO? OKAY.''

I SAID.

SO THE GOVERNMENT AND ITS WORKERS BROKE THEIR OWN LAWS. AND THEY GOT PAID THEIR REGULAR SALARIES. HYPOCRITICALLY DOING SO.

SO, ON THAT NOTE-  I THEN REALIZED I HAD TO GO TO COURT. IN CANADA. AND BEG AND PLEAD FOR THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT TO DO THE RIGHT THING. AND GIVE ME MY LICENCE BACK.

SO I COULD WORK, AND BE A USEFUL MEMBER OF SOCIETY. IN CANADA.

'''WHEREIN I WAS TOLD I WOULD HAVE TO GO TO A CANADIAN COURT AND SAY THIS.
TO A CANADIAN JUDGE.


O PLEASE 'CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING? AND DONT BREAK YOUR OWN LAWS BY ILLEGALLY  SUSPENDING MY DRIVERS LICENCE>/ PLEASE/ I BEG OF YOU, PLEASE?''''

 THATS WHAT I WAS TOLD TO DO.

SO.



SO, ON THAT NOTE, I THEN,  WENT THROUGH ALL THE MOTIONS OF THAT SITUATION...

FILING THE REQUIRED STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND NOTICE OF MOTION. 

THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION, BY THE WAY, HIRED THEIR OWN LAWYER , TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK.

BY THE WAY. 


AFTER THEY TOLD ME AND ADMITTED TO ME I WAS IN THE RIGHT, THEY ACTUALLY STILL HIRED A LAWYER TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK. ///

ISNT THAT INCREDIBLE/ ON THEIR PART?

 THEY HIRED A LAWYER. TO DO THAT.


A LAWYER WHO ACTUALLY SMELLED LIKE HE WAS ACTUALLY FARTING.

WHEN I STOOD IN THE COURT ROOM WITH HIM THAT DAY.

AND WHO TALKED A LOT TO THE JUDGE BEFORE THE COURT CASE.
WHO IN TURN KIND OF LOOKED LIKE FRANK CAPRIO. THE CHIEF JUDGE IN PROVIDENCE. WEIRD. BUT ANYWAYS. TO CONTINUE ON MY FACTUAL INFORMATION I ADDRESS HERE REGARDING MY DRIVERS LICENCE, 

THIS LAWYER TALKED A LOT TO THE JUDGE. 

THE LAWYER THE MINISTRY OF ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION HIRED. TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK THAT DAY.

WHY/ IT CERTAIN APPEARS THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS OBVIOUS.


BECAUSE THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THEIR WORKERS WERE TOTALLY INFURIATED THAT I MIGHT FIND WORK AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT WITH MY LIFE.
WEIRD ON THEIR PARTS. BUT THATS WHAT HAPPENED. SO, WHAT OTHER ANSWER COULD I POSSIBLY DRAW? TO THAT SITUATION.


SO THEY HIRED THEIR OWN LAWYER TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK.

INCREDIBLE BUT TRUE. 

SO, THERE I WAS IN THAT COURT ROOM, ACTUALLY WATCHING THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION LAWYER CHIT CHAT WITH THE JUDGE.

BEFORE COURT STARTED.



THEN, FINALLY, MY COURT CASE ARRIVED.

AFTER A FULL YEAR OF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT DELIBERATELY PREVENTING ME FROM WORKING ILLEGALLY ON THEIR PARTS.

I GO TO COURT,

AND WAIT PATIENTLY IN COURT ALL DAY ALMOST FOR MY CASE TO ARRIVE.

FINALLY MY COURT CASE COMES UP, AND I STAND BEFORE A JUDGE TO PRESENT MY CASE.

THE JUDGE THEN ALARMED, SAYS THIS.

'''SIR!
MY GOD!
WHERES YOUR LAWYER!""??
 YOUR NOT GOING TO FACE ME WITHOUT A LAWYER, ARE YOU?"""

HE SHRIEKED AT ME.

AT THAT MOMENT IN TIME.

I RESPONDED BACK TO THAT QUESTION WITH THE FOLLOWING WORDS.

''''PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO THIS, SIR. I DO NOT HAVE MONEY TO HIRE A LAWYER, SIR. BUT, I HAVE STUDIED THIS CASE. SIR.


 AND I CAN DEFEND MYSELF ON THIS MATTER, IN ORDER TO ATTAIN JUSTICE IN THIS CASE-NO PROBLEM THERE. I KNOW THE FACTS.

 SO IF WE CAN PROCEED, I WILL DO JUST THAT. WITH FACTS.''

AS COURTS DESIRE ''''''FACTS.''''

RIGHT? FACTS. DON'T WORRY. I'LL GIVE YOU THE FACTS OF THIS CASE. JUST START COURT. AND I'LL DO SO. 
COURTS DESIRE FACTS?'' RIGHT?
EVEN KANGAROO COURTS..'''
I SAID TO THAT JUDGE.

SO, ON THAT NOTE MAY WE PLEASE BEGIN COURT SIR.? ''

I SAID RESPECTFULLY.

ON THAT NOTE HE RESPONDED IN THIS FASHION. IN A LOUD VOICE HE SAID THIS.


'''NOT IN MY COURT ROOM!!
NO WAY!!

YOU HIRE A LAWYER AND PAY MONEY TO A LAWYER- IN ORDER TO BE DEFENDED IN MY COURT!'''
HE SHOUTED!

OR NO JUSTICE IS COMING YOUR WAY! NOT IN MY COURT'''
HE SHOUTED AT ME.

I LOOKED AT HIS ANTICS AT THIS POINT.

AND I WAS QUITE AMAZED THAT A JUDGE WOULD SAY THAT TO ME. IN A COURT OF LAW.

SO I SAID THIS AT THAT CONJECTURE TO THAT JUDGE.

.
 ''SIR, YOU JUST SAID TO ME, NO JUSTICE WOULD BE COMING MY WAY ON THIS SUBJECT OF MY DRIVERS LICENCE-UNLESS I PAID A LAWYER MONEY TO DEFND ME IN THIS MATTER, RIGHT?''

'''YES.'' HE RESPONDED TO THAT QUESTION.

SO, I SAID , 
''''ISN'T THAT BRIBERY, SIR?'''

TO THAT QUESTION, THE JUDGE LOOKED OFFENDED AND IRRITATED.

 THAT I ASKED SUCH A QUESTION.

AND BASAICALLY ON THAT NOTE HE DEMANDED THAT I SHUT UP AND BE REMOVED FROM HIS COURT ROOM.

I THEN ASKED THE JUDGE THAT DAY ANOTHER QUESTION.

I SAID THIS.

'/'SIR, THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS STATE THE FOLLOWING.

IT IS WRITTEN IN THE CONSTITUTION THAT A CANADIAN CITIZEN HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND HIMSELF OR HERSELF IN A CANADIAN COURT OF LAW ON ANY MATTER OF LAW WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF ANY MATTER RELATED TO LAW IN THIS COUNTRY OF THE SAID INCIDENT BEING INSTITUTED AS A MATTER APPLIED TO THE COURTS LOCATED ANYWHERE IN THE NATION OF CANADA.

. THAT IS PART OF THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION, SIR./'''''''''''

I SAID TO HIM.

HE THEN SAID TO ME THE FOLLOWING IN A SOMEWHAT LOUD VOICE..

'' I DON'T CARE THAT THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AND THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION SAYS YOU HAVE THAT RIGHT!'''
HE SAID.

GET OUT OF MY COURT ROOM.!''
HE EXCLAIMED TO ME AT THAT POINT...
BASICALLY HE SAID TO ME, AT THAT POINT TO GO JUMP IN A LAKE, IN OTHER WORDS. 
AND I SUSPECT, AT THAT POINT, IF HE COULD HAVE SHOVED ME INTO A LAKE, HE WOULD HAVE.

REFLECTIVE OF THIS IMAGE. BELOW.

''SO YOUR BREAKING YOUR HIPPOCRATIC OATH TO UPHOLD THE LAWS OF CANADA THEN?'''


I SAID TO HIM AT THAT POINT.

OR YOUR BREAKING THE OATH YOU TOOK WHEN YOU ENTERED INTO THE JUDGES CIRCUIT AND WHEN YOU TOOK YOUR BAR EXAM, AND THEN ENTERED INTO LAW.

YOU DID TAKE A HIPPOCRATIC OATH, OR SOME KIND OF OATH TO UPHOLD THE LAW AT THAT POINT, CORRECT?'' I SAID TO THIS JUDGE.

Teno

''''RIGHT? WHEN YOU BECAME A JUDGE, IN CANADA? RIGHT?"""

I SAID TO HIM. 


HE THEN SHRIEKED LOUDLY THE FOLLOWING WORDS TO ME.

I DON'T CARE IF ITS WRITTEN IN THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND YOURSELF IN ANY CANADIAN COURT ON THIS MATTER,

WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THIS SAID INCIDENT TAKING PLACE! REGARDING YOUR DRIVERS LICENCE BEING OBVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY SUSPENDED BY CANADAS GLORIOUSLY DIVINE EVIL AUTHORITY FIGURES IN THIS SUBJECT!!!

GET OUT OF MY COURTROOM!''

 HE SHOUTED WILDLY AT THAT POINT IN TIME.

AND IN DOING SO, I MEAN IN SHOUTING THAT TO ME AT THAT POINT IN TIME,  I THINK HE MIGHT HAVE HAD A BIT OF DROOL EMERGING FROM HIS MOUTH...

JUDGE LITTLE WAS HIS NAME...!''

I SAID AT THAT POINT. COMPOSE YOURSELF, SIR.

 AND
AT THAT POINT,  IT WAS SOMEWHAT ALARRMING, TO ME, AT LEAST, THAT HE WAS A JUDGE IN CANADA, I THOUGHT. AT THAT POINT.

BUT ANYWAYS, HE REFUSED TO SAY ANYTHING ELSE TO ME. I GUESS HE WAS PLEADING THE FIFTH AMENDMENT OR SOMETHING ON THAT COUNT.
REFLECTIVE OF THIS IMAGE HERE.

. 

EXACTLY. YES. EXACTLY.
 THEN I WAS ESCORTED OUT OF THAT GLORIOUS CANADIAN COURTROOM BY TWO WONDERFUL BAILIFFS. WHO WERE EYEING ME WILDLY.

KIND OF LIKE THOSE GUYS WHO GUARD JABBA THE HUY. IN THAT MOVIE, RETURN OF THE JEDI> .

THATS HOW THEY ACTED AT THAT MOMENT. IN ESCORTING ME OUT OF THAT CANADIAN COURTROOM. 

QUITE A KANAGAROO COURT.

WOW.

THATS WHAT IT OBVIOUSLY WAS. IN FACT IT WENT BEYOND THAT. LUNANCY. THATS WHAT THAT COURT WAS.

..BUT ANYWAYS, TO SUMMARIZE THIS SITUATION, I'VE SPENT THE LAST 20 YEARS SUFFERING LOST WORK, EMPLOYMENT,, LOST RELATIONSHIPS, TWO PARENTS DYING HORRIBLY IN HOSPITAL, PLUS MUCH EMOTIONAL SUFFERING DUE TO THE CLEAR INCOMPETENCY OF THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION ON THIS SUBJECT.

WHICH IS WHY I HAVE CHOSEN TO SUE .

I DESERVE COMPENSATION AT LEAST. 

LOST WAGES. FOR THE WORK I HAD WITH THE MOVING COMPANY.

I AT LEAST DESERVE THAT. TECHNICALLY, AFTER WHAT THE GOVERNMENT BROKE THIS MANY OF THEIR OWN LAWS I SHOULD SUE THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT FOR MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

LOOK AT THE FACTS OF THIS SITUATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


EVERYTHING I JUST WROTE HERE IS FACTUAL.

FACTUAL!!

DO YOU KNOW THE DEFINITION TO THE WORD 'FACT? ON THAT NOTE.

LISTEN TO THE FACTS!

I SHOULD SUE FOR MILLIONS ON THAT NOTE.

IT WOULD ALMOST BE A LACK OF JUSTICE IF I DID NOT!

LOOK AT THE FACTS!WHETHER YOUR NAME IS JUDGE REINER OR JUDGE LITTLE OR WHATEVER YOUR NAME IS.

THESE FACTS ADDRESSED HERE ARE STILL THAT. FACTS!

BUT, WHATEVER.


 I'VE DECIDED I WILL BE SATISFIED IF I AM COMPENSATED FOR THE LOST WAGES I INCURRED WHEN THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION ILLEGALLY SUSPENDED MY DRIVERS LICENCE, ADMITTED TO ME THAT THEY MADE A MISTAKE AND THEN , AFTER DOING THAT,  DELIBERATELY HIRED A LAWYER TO PREVENT ME FROM GETTING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK. THAT LAWYER WAS IN THE COURT ROOM THAT DAY.

and before the court case started, i briefly saw the lawyer for the ministry of transporation mingling and making small talk, cheerily with the judge who presided over my case that day.

judge little.

and man, did he belittle the canadian court system that day.

with his lack of justice. displayed towards the laws addressed in canada.

incredible. the lawyer for the ministry of transportation was mingling happily with judge little. before court proceeded that day.

talk about being in cahouts perhaps? with corruption?



VERY STRANGE ON THEIR PART.

chatting together before court even commences. THAT DAY.
 WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? ON THAT NOTE? I MEAN, HONESTLY?

BUT WHATEVER.


IF I RECALL , HIS NAME WAS JOHN PETRONOSIAK.

THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONS L.AWYER.

I MEAN.

ISN'T THAT TECHNICALLY BRIBERY?

 YES. IT CLEARLY IS. AND AS FAR AS I KNOW, BRIBERY IS AGAINST CANADAS LAWS. I'M PRETTY SURE I WAS IN A CANADIAN COURT ROOM TOO. YES. I WAS. SO?

I DIDN'T HAVE MONEY FOR A LAWYER. SO I GOT NO JUSTICE. THATS WHAT THE JUDGE SAID TO ME THAT DAY.
 SO IF I HAD MONEY TO HIRE A LAWYER THEN I COULD HAVE GOT JUSTICE.

MEANING MY DRIVERS LICENCE BACK. ON AN ISSUE THAT THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONS EMPLOYEES ADMITTED TO ME WAS THEIR FAULT TO BEGIN WITH. NOT MY FAULT.
BY WHICH FACTOR, TECHNICALLY, I WAS PREVENTED FROM HAVING PROPER EMPLOYMENT. FOR YEARS. AND A VARIETRY OF RELATIONSHIPS LOST.

AND MANY OTHER PROBLEMS AROSE. UNNECCACVARY HARDSHIPS ON MANY FACETS OF LIFE. DUE TO BEING UNABLE TO WORK. THROUGH NO FAULT OF MY OWN. COURTESY OF THE MINISTRY OF ONTARIOS TRANSPORTATION.

AND BY WHICH FACTOR I WAS PREVENTED FROM ASSISTING MY MOTHER WHEN SHE NEEDED HEALTH CARE. BY WHICH FACTOR MY MOTHER DSIED HORRIBLY. IN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. IN LONDON ONTARIO.
WHEN SHE FELL ILL.
AND MANY OTHER HARDSHIPS BEFELL ME. DUE TO THEIR UNNECCACARY RIDICULOUS TECHNICALLY HYPOCRITRICAL MISTAKE.


HMMNNN?

WELL, OKAY , YO?
YO? YO?

YA KNOW?
OKAY.

PERHAPS I SHOULD GET SOMEONE TO HIRE A LAWYER FOR ME. AND SUE THE GOVERNMENTS MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION? THEN?

FOR 3 MILLION DOLLARS!?

 LOOK AT THE FACTS! OF WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DID TO ME! HERE@!!


WHO COULD BLAME ME FOR SUING FOR THIS? ESPECIALLY WHEN SO MANY OTHER PEOPLE HAVE SUED FOR SO MANY LESS THINGS! AND GOT COMPENSATED MILLIONS! LIKE THE WOMAN WHO SPILT HOT COFFEE ON HERSELF. BOUGHT FROM MCDONMALDS!

 CLEARLY NOT MCDONALDS FAULT!@

 YET THAT WOMAN GOT PAID MILLIONS! FOR A MISTAKE SHE MADE.

WOW. 

IN MY CASE I'M INFINITELY RIGHT. SO 'IM NOT EVEN SURE THATS A GOOD COMPARISON. EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THE GOVERNMENT DOESNT COMPENSATE THE PEOPLE THAT TECHNICALLY DESERVE COMPENSATION!

BUT WHATEVER.

OKAY.

LETS GO THROUGH THE FACTS. PROPERLY. THAT WAY.

AND GIVE THE DECENT CITIZEN WHO ASSISTS ME IN HIRING A LAWYER HALF MY SETTLEMENT. I WONDER IF JUDGE LITTLE AND THE MINISTRY OF CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION WILL BE PLEASED IF I DO THAT?
'

. 

Cycling Road Fines – City of Toronto

www.toronto.ca › ... › Cycling in Toronto › Cycling & the Law

Bicycles are considered vehicles as part of the Act. Ontario Court of Justice ... the Demerit Point System is for the regulation of motor vehicles; not for cyclists.

You visited this page on 23/02/20.

Can cyclists get demerit points like drivers ... - FindLaw Canada

traffic.findlaw.ca › article › can-cyclists-get-demerit-points-like-driver...

It's the rare cyclist who doesn't at least bend the rules of the road. ... Demerit points are part of the penalty for certain traffic infractions like excessive speed, running red lights or distracted driving. ... Can your bike infraction affect your licence?

Ontario Canada, MTO info | Motorized Bicycle Engine Kit Forum motorbicycling.com › ... › Laws and Legislation for Motorized Bicycles Feb 8, 2009 - There are laws that are very grey pertaining to motorized bikes ... You will no longer be permitted to drive a moped on any driver's licence. ... or even an 80cc, engine kits that are available could not be considered a motor ... around on because in Ontario right now even suspended drivers can operate one.

www.insurance-canada.ca › 2018/06/01 › kanetix-cyclist-traffic-ticket

Jun 1, 2018 - Did you know that even when riding a bicycle you can earn a traffic ticket ... Any ticket you get while cycling should not result in demerit points ..

Highway Traffic Act, RSO 1990, c. H.8 - Ontario.ca

www.ontario.ca › laws › statute

Consolidation Period: From January 1, 2020 to the e-Laws currency date. ... Driving prohibited while licence suspended ... (c) that has no hand or foot operated clutch or gearbox driven by the motor and transferring power to the driven wheel, ... a power-assisted bicycle, a motorized snow vehicle, a traction engine, a farm ...

Wait a minute: no demerit points for cyclists | I Bike TO

www.ibiketo.ca › blog › 2008/06/18 › wait-minute-no-demerit-points...

Jun 18, 2008 - Now, for many years, I have heard lots of reports about them trying to hand out demerit points to those cyclists who had a driver's license while ...

Motorized bicycles sometimes cross moped line, police say ...

herald-review.com › news › local › motorized-bicycles-sometimes-cross...

Apr 28, 2011 - But the law defines a moped, with or without optional pedal power, ... 30 mph and an engine no bigger than 50cc that does not require the ... Moped riders need a driver's license, insurance and registration to be legal. ... bike) riders are suspended or revoked for previous DUIs, (driving ... Related to this story ...

 

Breaking rules on a bike can lead to demerit points | Toronto ...

torontosun.com › 2017/06/17 › wcm

Jun 17, 2017 - For the record, if you get a ticket while riding your bike, you're not supposed to get demerit points on your Ontario driver's license. Make sure the ticket notes it as a cycling infraction at the time that it is written.

If you get a ticket riding your bike, you're not supposed to get demerits on your Ontario driver's licence – as long as the ticket says you were on your bicycle, says Ontario's Ministry of Transportation. "Bicycle infractions are not applied to the driving record," says MTO spokesman Bob Nichols in an email.Jun 17, 2014

If I get a ticket riding my bike, will it affect my driver's licence ...

Lorraine Explains: Suspended driver's licence? How about an ...

driving.ca › column › lorraine-explains-suspended-licence-how-about-a...

Aug 26, 2019 - When restricted to an attached electric (no gas or diesel) motor of not more ... km/h, our federal laws state they don't require a licence, licence plates, ... a rider, by having the engine work only when the bike is being pedaled. ... In Ontario, if you've had your licence suspended for a criminal code ... RELATED.

'''JUSTICE WILL BE BLIND TO HISTORY.
UNTIL WINDSWEPT LEAVES RETURN TO THE BARREN TREE.''' 

QUOTATION CONNECTED TO 2ND PETER 1: 19-21.

 
NOSTRADAMUS. C7Q93.

TRUE.

NOTE JUST FOR THE APPROPRIATE SAKE OF RECORD.  IN CONNECTION TO 1ST CORINTHIANS 6: 1-3, RIGHTEOUS BEINGS WHO HONOR JESUS CHRIST IN REAL DECENT TRUTH DO NOT HONOR WICKED UNJUST JUDGMENTS. THE WHOLE CHRISTIAN BIBLE AS WELL AS ALL OF THE WORDS OF JESUS CHRIST MAKE THAT STATEMENT THOROUGHLY CLEAR. THATS FOR SURE.  Got it, thanks! In dealing with the government of canada,    and its peculiar contradictory "" clearly    hypocritical laws," sometimes it's like playing    Russian roulette. With a fortune teller.    Similar to this far side cartoon.  IN OTHER WORDS, SUCH A CARTOON REFLECTS THE FOLLOWING WORDS  ADDRESSED BY THIS WEBSITE WRITER. WORDED AS FOLLOWS. ''MY GOD! I'VE PLACED MY TRUST IN THE  CANADIAN GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE DECENT LAWS!  DEVOID OF DELIBERATE HYPOCRISIES GALORE. WHICH HAS RESULTED IN DISASTER . FOR THE WRITER OF THIS WEBSITE! . . REGARDING THE WRITER OF THIS WEBSITE.  AND THE PREDICAMENT I RIDICULOUSLY UNJUSTLY FACE.  DUE TO THE OBVIOUS HYPOCRITICAL CORRUPTIONS OF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT,  THE ALL CANADIAN AUTHORITIES WHO DID NOT PROPERLY STAND UP  AGAINST SUCH A HYPOCRITICAL JUDGMENT EXACTED AGAINST THIS WEBSITE WRITER. THAT ABOUT SUMS UP THIS SITUATION. ENTIRELY IN FACT.  ' Done. Very nice!

HOLY JESUS.

I HAVE ENOUGH COMMON SENSE TO NOT GO CRAZY OVER THIS. BUT I UNDERSTAND UNFORTUNATELY HOW SOME CITIZENS DO GO CRAZY.
REFLECTIVE OF THE IMAGES BELOWWW.

WOW.

 

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

To the readers of this site. The following website addresses issues which relate to the ministry of transportation in ontario Canada. ...

• 

  (no title)

  TO THE READERS OF THIS WEBSITE. THIS IS AN APPEAL TO ANYBODY SENSIBLE READING THIS WEBSITE. AND 'ON THAT NOTE, THE COMMENT SECTIO...
• 

  (no title)

  DRIVERS HANDBOOK ONTARIO. THE YEAR 2000. ONE SECTION OF THE HAND BOOK RULES STATES THE FOLLOWING. AN ONTARIO RESIDENT CANNOT HAV...
• 

  (no title)

  TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. REGARDING THE MATTER OF MY DRIVERS LICENCE SUSPENSION, SOMETIMES I FEEL, I COULD CRY OVER THIS. THEN I TELL...

Search This Blog

• Home

About Me

hermaphroditusc2q45

View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

• March 2020 (4)

Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.

 

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

ridebiketrueee.blogspot.com   Home ...

• 

  (no title)

  To the readers of this site. The following website addresses issues which relate to the ministry of transportation in ontario Canada. ...
• 

  (no title)

  TO THE READERS OF THIS WEBSITE. THIS IS AN APPEAL TO ANYBODY SENSIBLE READING THIS WEBSITE. AND 'ON THAT NOTE, THE COMMENT SECTIO...
• 

  (no title)

  DRIVERS HANDBOOK ONTARIO. THE YEAR 2000. ONE SECTION OF THE HAND BOOK RULES STATES THE FOLLOWING. AN ONTARIO RESIDENT CANNOT HAV...

Search This Blog

• Home

About Me

hermaphroditusc2q45

View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

• March 2020 (5)